| SILVER TOP | |||
| 34 | Dennis Harris | 113 | |
| SUPERSTARS | |||
| 42 | Pete Blomfield | 109 | |
| 7 | David Burton | 103 | |
| 99 | Peter Scott Jnr | 100 | |
| 72 | Colin Goodswen | (98) | |
| RED TOPS | |||
| 324 | Simon Turner | 87 | |
| 547 | Pete Ross | 72 | |
| 815 | Brad Moss | 52 | |
| 98 | Peter Scott | 52 | |
| 33 | Terry Harris | 42 | |
| (323) | John Turner | (31) | |
| (117) | Bill Chance | (4) | |
| (633) | Barry Amas | (0) | |
| BLUE TOPS | |||
| 32 | Daryl Harris | 31 | |
| 521 | Alan Gray | 30 | |
| 875 | Ian Moss | 15 | |
| (29) | Mark Williams | (0) | |
| (261) | Simon Hogg | (0) | |
| YELLOW TOPS | |||
| 89 | Bryan Scott | 8 | |
| 525 | Nigel Trench | 6 |
All other cars are graded 'White' unless otherwise
governed by the grading rules.
Returning drivers return in last grade held.
What do you
drivers think about the way points are awarded at present?
It seems as though no driver can work out how many points they have
scored because of the complicated way in which they are awarded. I can't
tell you exactly how they are worked out as Spedeworth haven't replied
to my emails. I do know that double points are awarded for Finals, but
why? It's all cars in all races and the chances are there's less cars in the
Final than there is in the heats. It's not as though you have to qualify.
Would you, the drivers, prefer a system whereby you were able to simply
work out how many points you scored at a meeting and would you prefer
Final pints to be the same as the heats?
Let me know what your thoughts on it are - email
v8stockcars@googlemail.com
